WTF!
Man this is the SECOND time I've had to give a high score to a bad game!
So let me break it down:
Graphics: The graphics were excelent, and well rendered, there was no jittering, slowdown, or signs of MSpaint useage.
Style: The game was tasteful, and had a good concept. It was orriginal.
Sound: The sounds did the job they needed to, and were well matached to what they represent, (they were a bit repeatative though)
Vionence: there was no violence to rate
Interactivity: The game responded to the inputs that I made with out bogging the game down, and did so when I entered those inputs. Also the controll scheme responded to both keyboard and mouse (Esentialy digital AND analog) input; this raised you score in this catagory.
Humor: I found nothing funny about this game.
Overall: The Game was solid, it had no decernable bugs, and presented its self well.
Ok, where you failed here: the last guy was right, your physics are WAY to sensitave. even small inputs send the ball flying. I understand the idea behind this game, and i have even seen games like this before in real life, but it's just WAAAAAYYYY to sensitve to anything the player does, perhaps you could make the hole a little bit more...forgiving, and if the player touches the hole, they win, as opposed to "they-must-stop-the-ball-directly-IN-the-hole."